V# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29872 OF 2012 «• c o V Between: Tentu Sateesh, S/o Sanyasi Naidu, Age; 28 years, R/o Kusumuru Village Therlam Mandal, Vizianagaram District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, - Rep. by its Commissioner, Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Project Director, District Water Management Society and Addl. District Programme Coordinator of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Vizianagaram. 3. The Project Officer, District Water Management Society and Addl. District Programme Coordinator of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Vizianagaram. 4. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Terlam Mandal, Vizianagaram District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 in terminating the services of the petitioner vide their letter No. 5682/2011/S.A.3 Dated 05.06.2012 which was rejected by the 2nd Respondent vide his Memo No. 5682/2011/S.A.III Dated 22.08.2012 is arbitrary, bad and illegal and violation of principles of natural justice and unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and without basis and without enquiry, consequently - ■ *.s^t aside the same by directing the Respondents to reinstate the petitioner by continuity of service in the interest of justice. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 38112 OF 2012) 'ib-' Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Impugned order of the 3rd Respondent vide his letter No. 5682/2011/S.A.3 Dated 05.06.2012 and Memo No. 5682/2011/S.A.III Dated 22.08.2012 issued by the 2 Respondent by reinstating the petitioner as a Field Assistant, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KURITI BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents No.41 to 3: SRI M SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M S R CHANDRA MURTHY, SPL SC FOR MGNREGS nd The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010027232012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N [3457] WRIT PETITION NO: 29872/2012 Between: Tentu Sateesh ...PETITIONER AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KURITI BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2.M SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following Order: Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. OneCCto SRI. KURITI BHASKARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] % 2. One CC to SRI M S R CHANDRA MURTHY, SPL SC FOR MGNREGS / / [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. M SUBRAHMANYAM, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies / /. / / / / i :i I / f i PRK HIGH COURT DATED:20/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.29872 of 2012 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS