[2025:RJ-JP:49228] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18362/2025 Natwar Singh S/o Shyamveer Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Kamalpura, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 412117). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Directorate Of Mines And Geological Department, Rajasthan, Udaipur. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the answer of questions No. 18, 86, 93, 105 of Question Booklet Series Q-165 of Surveyor disputed by the petitioner may kindly be corrected, ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents further be directed quash and set aside the Final answer key dt. 08.08.2025 and respondents be directed to grant bonus marks to the petitioner for the questions which were corrected as per the preliminary answer key. iii) Issue a writ or direction in the nature thereof thereby the paper setter of the examination for the [2025:RJ-JP:49228] (2 of 3) [CW-18362/2025] post of Surveyor be black listed by the respondents and they be punished. iv) Issue an appropriate writ or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to correct the answers in the answer key with regard to questions disputed by the petitioner and thereby consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of Surveyor with all consequential benefits. v) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 19.03.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14401/2021 (Nisha Panwar Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board) other connected matters and in case of Ramdhan Kumawat Vs. State of Rajasthan : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10622/2014 submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of order passed in cases of Nisha Panwar Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (supra) and Ramdhan Kumawat Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of [2025:RJ-JP:49228] (3 of 3) [CW-18362/2025] Nisha Panwar Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (supra) and Ramdhan Kumawat Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Misc. application, if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/15