Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5510-DB RFA No. 100121 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100121 OF 2020 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. RUKMAWWA W/O. VENKANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: BAVALATTI, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587116.
2.
SMT. PADMAVATI @ PADMAVVA W/O. TIMMANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: MALLAPUR P.L., TAL: MUHDOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313.
3.
SHRI. HARIYAPPAGOUDA S/O. VENKANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: BAVALATTI, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587116. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SANGRAM S.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. CHANNAVVA W/O. RAMANAGOUDA BIRADAR PATIL, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: BUDNI B.K., TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313.
2.
SHRI. GOVINDAGOUDA S/O. GOUDAPPAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: BAVALATTI, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S.KAMATE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED)
Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.04.02 16:03:24 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5510-DB RFA No. 100121 of 2020
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.12.2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MUDHOL IN O.S.NO.135/2018, BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT APPEAL AND DISMISS THE SUIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM)
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and respondents extensively in the morning session, the matter was passed over. When the matter was taken up for further hearing in the afternoon session,
learned counsel appearing for the appellants, on instructions, submits that he intends to withdraw the appeal. His submission is recorded.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5510-DB RFA No. 100121 of 2020
2. In view of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
ALB Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31