SMT. SHILPA W/O RAVINDRA KULKARNI v. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
WP/108071/2023 · 2025-03-24
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46853 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46853 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5366 WP No. 108071 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 108071 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. SHILPA W/O RAVINDRA KULKARNI, AGE. 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. DOOR NO. MIG-317, “MAGALU”, NEAR CHOUDESHWARI TEMPLE, BEHIND NEW COURT, KHB COLONY, AMARAVATI, HARIHAR-577 603. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGRAM.S.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (I/C), FOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL NCC, NCC DIRECTORATE (NCC CELL), CUNNINGHAM ROAD, NO.8, BANGALORE-560 052.
2.
THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, 2ND GATE, 6TH FLOOR, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5366 WP No. 108071 of 2023
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Addl. Registrar (Judicial) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non- compliance of office objections’ on 24.03.2025.
The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44