RAJVEER SINGH @ MONU SINGH S/O UDAY SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11078/2025 · 2025-10-31
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46852 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46852 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43725] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11078/2025 Rajveer Singh @ Monu Singh S/o Uday Singh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Kukad, Police Station Mor, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At District Jail, Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Dixit For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Rajat Choudhary for MR. Ajatshatru Mina HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 31/10/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.112/2025 registered at Police Station Todaraisingh, District Tonk for offence under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 316(2), 340(2), 61(2) BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that on the ground mentioned in the FIR, a compromise was arrived at between the parties on 10.02.2025. He argued that as per compromise the due date of payment of cheque was fixed on 05.07.2025 but before the due date, in the month of April the cheque was presented and the same was dishnoured due to which
[2025:RJ-JP:43725] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11078/2025] this FIR has been lodged on false and concocted grounds. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 12.08.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed, the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Rajveer Singh @ Monu Singh S/o Uday Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /31