[2025:RJ-JP:49232] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1537/2025 Komal Kumari Meena D/o Premi Lal Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Nai Meenayo Ka Bass, Nangal Lotwara District Dausa (Rajasthan) At Present Selected On The Post Of Senior Physical Education Teacher Against The Advertisement Year 2022 (Roll No.4030856) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Secondary Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Rajasthan). 3. Joint Director, School Education, Bharatpur Division, Bharatpur, (Rajasthan). 4. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer (Rajasthan). 5. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 6. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.C. Vyas Mr. Tanay Jareda For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG Mr. M.F Baig Ms. Namita Parihar, DY.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: [2025:RJ-JP:49232] (2 of 3) [CW-1537/2025] “(i) To issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the Respondents be directed to given joining/posting to the petitioner on the post of Senior Physical Education Teacher at District Bharatpur in place of District Karauli and nearby Village & Post at District Bharatpur as per her merit position. (ii) To issue an appropriate writ order or Direction in the nature thereof and thereby the quash and set aside the impugned action of respondents by which respondents denied/non joining the posting place as per her merit position and given posting less meritorious candidates in place of petitioner and also may kindly be directed to the respondents that they complied the circular dated 18.052020 necessarily.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 09.04.2014 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2226/2014 titled as Smt. Anju Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and judgment dated 02.04.2019 in SB CWP No.23680/2018 titled as Sunita Kumari Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid ratio. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of ratio in case of Smt. Anju Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Sunita Kumari Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:49232] (3 of 3) [CW-1537/2025] 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Smt. Anju Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and Sunita Kumar Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /216