IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI ^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 39089 OF 2018 /r r Between: T. Venkateswarulu, S/o T. Anjaneyulu, aged about 60 years, Occ . Retired Conductor, E.No. 423044, Nandikotkur Depot, Kurnool District, R/o. H.No. 46-273, Budhavaripeta, Kurnool, Kurnool District. / ...Petitioner AND 1. The A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, rep.by its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep.by its Executive Director, Kadapa Zone, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nandikotkur Depot, Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the orders passed by the 2 respondent in Proceedings No. PA/19(45)/2016-ED-KZ. dt insofar as the terms and conditiorrs at Point No. 5 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution and set-aside same and consequently direct the respondents to pay all the consequential benefits to the petitioner. nd 25.06.2016 / y lANO: 1 OF 201 fi Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the - in support of the petition, the respondents to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner by suspending the operation of the impugned orders passed by the 2 PA/19(45)/2016-ED-KZ, dt. 25.06.2016 i at Point No. 5. circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i High Court may be pleased to direct the nd respondent in Proceedings No. insofar as the terms and conditions Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondents: ARAVALA RAMA APSRTC KKAC) RAO(SC FOR The Court made the following: % APHC010769352018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE f PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 39089/2018 1 \ Between: T. Venkateswarulu ...PETITIONER AND The A P State Road Transport Corporation and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: l.N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): l.ARAVALA RAMA RA0(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the orders passed by the 2nd respondent in Proceedings No.PA/1945/2016EDKZ dt.25.06.2016 insofar as the terms and conditions at Point No 5 as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution and set aside same and consequently, direct the respondents to pay all the consequential benefits to the petitioner." 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption "For dismissal", none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-APSRTC is in attendance. 2 5- In that view, the Writ order as to costs. Pending applications, if Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No any, shall stand closed. / Sd/- K.J. RAJA BABU ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT To, NOFRCER SECTI 1- OneCCto SRI. N VR 2. One CC to SRI. aRAVALA KKAC) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies AMARNATH Advocate [OPUC] RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC ^ high court \ DATED.06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.39089 of 2018 Ha:: OP 2 6 SEP 20?5 Current Section . m O dismissing the writ petition for non-prosecution WITHOUT COSTS