Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010633652025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33495/2025 Between:
1. ALAVALAPATI RAVI SHANKAR REDDY, S/O.A. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-06, KARNAPAPAYYAPALLI VILLAGE, VELIDINDIA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
4. T VASANTHA, W/O. G. KESAVA PRAKASH, R/O. 12-2-422/37, FLAT NO. 102, SAI SIVA KRISHNA APARTMENT, PRIYA COLONY, GUDIMALKAPUR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No 3 and 4 in interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner land in Sy.No.398 an extent of Ac.0.05.05 cents of Anantapuramu Raral,
2
Anantapuramu Mandal, Anantapuramu District is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principals natural justice, violation of Art. 14, Art, 19(l)(g) and Art. 21 and Art. 300-A of the Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No 3 and 4 not to interfere in to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of land in Sy.No.398 an extent of Ac. 0.05.05 cents of Anantapuramu Raral, Anantapuramu Mandal, Anantapuramu District and not to call the petitioner and his family members to the 3rd respondent office i.e., SDPO office, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu district pending disposal of the above Writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. E ANJANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: <…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents Nos.3 and 4 in interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner land in Sy.No.398 an extent of Ac.0.05 cents of Anantapuramu Raral, Anantapuramu Mandal, Anantapuramu District is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principals natural justice violation of Art.14, Art.19(1)(g) and Art.21 and Art.300-A of the Constitution of India and pass……=
2. Sri E.Anjana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 03.12.2025 SNI
4
325 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33495 of 2025
Dt.03.12.2025
SNI