HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12229 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sandeep Kumar Singh, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs- "(a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent No.2 and 3 to take action for opening tubewell after rebore of tubewell Purva Jain, District Auraiya and also transfer to Sri Madan Mohan Singh, Incharge Jiledar from Sub Division Bidhuna to any other Sub Division as per transfer policy year 2024-2025. (b). Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. (c). Award cost of the writ petition of the petitioners." 3. The petitioner is resident of village Lakhuno, Post Purva Jain, District Auraiya. There exists a tube-well which supplies water to the houses of the villagers including the house of the petitioner. It is submitted that the tube- well has become non-functional and requires re-boring and only after re- boring the same, the villagers will have potable water for farming and because of the fact that the tube-well is non-functional, the petitioner and other villagers are facing serious problems in farming. Accordingly, it is contended that the grievance of the petitioner may be looked into by the competent authority. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shalendra Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Sri Sandeep Kumar Singh, Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.3-District Magistrate, Auraiya, within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. 6. In case the respondent No.3 finds that the grievance raised by the petitioner is genuine and non-functioning of the tube-well is causing serious hurdle to the villagers in carrying out the agricultural activities, he would address the said grievance forthwith. September 24, 2025 SS WRIC No. 12229 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad