Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4684 (UTT)

SHAISTA ABRAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/452/2025 · 2025-04-02

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 12 WPSS No.452 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narein Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. Heard. It is the case of the petitioner that he was posted as Assistant Teacher, LT Grade (English) in Government Girls Secondary School, Jawahar Jyoti, Damuadhunga, District Nainital. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in the service record, the length of service rendered by her in remote area has not been correctly reflected. The petitioner gave representation to rectify the error, but it has not been acted upon. Therefore, now the petitioner seeks directions that the representation dated 26.10.2024, Annexure No.5 to the writ petition, may be directed to be decided within a stipulated time. Learned State Counsel gives a statement that the representation of the petitioner may be decided within four weeks from today. In view of the statement given by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 02.04.2025 RV