Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:63915-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12531 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sandeep Agrawal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Pandey,Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent authority in deciding the claim/representation dated 09.11.2024 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Moradabad, is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Shahroz (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad