Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46835 (CHH)

ASHOK VERMA v. SMT. NIRMALA TIKARIHA

SA/605/2025 · 2025-11-06

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:54330 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 605 of 2025 1 - Ashok Verma S/o Shekhu Verma Aged About 48 Years R/o Bhalesur, Post- Mohra, P.S.- Suhela, Tehsil- Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Smt. Nirmala Tikariha W/o Sadhuram Tikariha Aged About 66 Years R/o Plot No. 372, Sundar Nagar Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Chandrakala W/o Late Saroj Kumar Dhurandhar Aged About 62 Years R/o 608 Harshit Royal Nursing Vihar, Katul Board, Durg (C.G.), Through G.P.A. Khemraj Dhurandhar. 3 - Smt. Nalini Verma W/o Late Sevakram Verma Aged About 57 Years R/o C-259 Rohinipuram, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Kumari Niranjana Baghel D/o Late Hariprem Baghel Aged About 55 Years R/o Plot No. 372, Sundar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.11.07 14:48:51 +0530 2 5 - Smt. Laxmi W/o Khemraj Dhurandhar Aged About 53 Years R/o Plot No. 24, Krishna Sakha Society, Danganiya Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Dharmesh Verma S/o Late Sevakram Verma Aged About 43 Years R/o C-259 Rohinipuram Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Pramendra Verma S/o Late Sevakram Verma Aged About 40 Years R/o C-259 Rohinipuram Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Sudhanshu Singrol S/o Dhanaram Singrol Aged About 31 Years R/o C- 318 Rohinipuram Raipur (C.G.) 9 - Himanshu Singrol S/o Dhanaram Singrol Aged About 28 Years R/o C- 318 Rohinipuram Raipur (C.G.) 10 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Balodabazar (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Saurabh Kale, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Aishwarya Kumar Dubey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 07/11/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition with liberty to file a better constituted petition in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the other side would not oppose the said prayer. 3 3. In view of the above, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the said liberty as prayed for. 4. Consequently, all the pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka