[2025:RJ-JP:42295] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15748/2025 Mahesh Singh S/o Shri Sawai Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village And Post Raipur Patan Tehsil Patan, District Sikar Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Director Elementary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar. 5. District Education Officer (Hq), Elementary Education Sikar. 6. Block Education Officer, Patan District Sikar. 7. Government Senior Secondary School, Raipur Patan, Block Patan District Sikar Through Its Principal ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby the impugned orders dated17.9.2025 and 19.9.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to restore and keep the contractual services of the petitioner till 13.02.2028 in all respect in light of DOP Circular dated 11.7.2017. b) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court [2025:RJ-JP:42295] (2 of 2) [CW-15748/2025] may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 09.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17399/2025 titled as “Nathulal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Passed by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of DOP circular and judgment referred hereinabove but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner is provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner are still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /42