HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 68080 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. October 9, 2025 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar, Ravindra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anoop Trivedi (Senior Adv.), Mahendra Pratap, Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Pranjal Mehrotra (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) M/S Mohan Concast P Ltd. Thru Director Poonam Garg .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad