Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46823 (AP)

THE COMMISIONER OF CENTRLA EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, VSP v. M/S SYNERGIES -DOORAY AUTOMOTIVE LTD, VSP.

CEA/76/2010 · 2025-02-05

B Krishna Mohan, Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALS NO: 76 OF 2010 Central Excise Appeal under Section 35(G) of Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Final Order No. 191/08 dated 26.02.2008 received on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore preferred against the Order in Original No. 09/2005-06(R.P) dated 29.07.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Visakhapatnam-l Between: The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Visakhapatnam-l Commissionerate, Port Area, Visakhapatnam - 530 035. ...Appellant AND M/S Synergies -Dooray Automotive Ltd, VSP., Rep.by its Managing Director, [Synergiles Castings Ltd.,] Visakhapatnam. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: SRI MANIKANTA SIVA REPRESENTING SRI B.V.S.CHALAPATHI RAO, STANDING COUNSEL FOR CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P VIKRAM The Court made the following JUDGMENT : APHC010885802017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICENYAPATHYVIJAY CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO: 76/2010 Between: The Commisioner Of Centrla Excise And Customs, Vsp ...APPELLANT AND M/s Synergies Dooray Automotive Ltd Vsp Counsel for the Appellant: ...RESPONDENT 1.B VS CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 2 HBKM,J & HVN,J C.E.A.No.76 of 2010 %'■ The Court made the following- JUDGMENT. (Per Hon ble Sri Justice B Krishna Mohan) Mr. Manikanta Siva, the learned counsel representing the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal on the ground of monetary limits. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR | //TRUE COPY// I?' ^ SECTION OFFICER 1 To. 1. OneGC to Sri B.V.S.Chalapathi Rao, Standing Counsel for Central Excise and Customs [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri P. Vikram, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies stu TAG sree (X) It is noticed that after dispatching of the Judgment dated 06.02.2025 in CEA No.76 of 2010, the name of the Standing Counsel for Central Excise and Customs was wrongly mentioned instead of Sri B.V.S.Chalapathi Rao, Standing Counsel for Central Excise & Customs therefore corrections are carried out in relevant places in the Judgment dated 06.02.2025 in CEA No.76 of 2010 which was dispatched on 19.04.2025. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR HIGH COURT DATED:06/02/2025 13/05/2025 AMENDED JUDGMENT CEA.No.76 of 2010 DISMISSING THE CEA AS WITHDRAWN