Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46818 (AP)

Smt. Cherukuri Sandyarani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9843/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010178852021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9843/2021 Between: 1. SMT. CHERUKURI SANDYARANI,, W/O. LATE COL. RATNA KUMAR (RTD.), AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, . R/O. 3-143-B, NIRVANA 5TH FLOOR, KAVURI HILLS, MADHAPUR, HYDERABAD-81. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETERIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MUSNURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUSNURU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. NANDIGAM RAMESH BABU, S/O. NARAYANA RAO AGED 68 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO 208, SRI SAI BALAJI ENCLAVE, MULUKUTLAVARI STREET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PRESENTLY LIVING IN U.S.A REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. NANDIGAM SRI KRISHNA VARA PRASAD, S/O. NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. KALARAYANAGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. NANDIGAM SRI KRISHNA VARA PRASAD, S/O. NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. KALARAYANAGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. KODURU SURESH S/O NAGABHADRA RAO AGED 40 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 22D- 2-16, RAMAKRISHNAPURAM, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. CHIJURI BHASKAR RAO S/O LAKSMINARASAIAH AGEDABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O CHEKKAPALLI VILLAGE,MUSUNURUMANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus- i.To declare the 3rd respondent proceedings M.0 No. 6 of 2021 as null and void and set aside the same, ii.To direct the 2nd respondent to take action against the 5th respondent in not initiating any action on the complaints filed by the petitioner, To direct the respondent authorities not to interfere with petitioner possession in an extent of Ac. 2.94 Cents situated in Sy. No. 25/4 and 25/5, situated in Chintalavalli Village, Musunur Mandal, Krishna District, as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of The Constitution of India.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court dated 14.06.2021 in I.A.No.1 of 2021, no further orders are required in this matter. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9843 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr