Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46816 (PNJ)

SIMARJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/3799/2025 · 2025-04-17

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-3799-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CRWP-3799-2025 Date of decision: 17.04.2025 SIMARJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners (through hybrid mode) Mr. Jastej Singh, DAG, Punjab. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J.(ORAL) 1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to protect the lives and personal liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 to 6 not to interfere in the personal lives and liberty of the petitioners. 2. Learned State counsel assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 10.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner(s), within a period of three days from today, in the light of notification No.HOMEHM-40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch). 3. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the instant petition in case, cause of action survives. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 17.04.2025 Nisha Yadav Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NISHA 2025.04.17 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document