Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46814 (CHH)

RAJENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI v. FULSINGH RAJPUT

MCC/1091/2025 · 2025-10-29

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 MCC No. 1091 of 2025 2025:CGHC:52970 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1091 of 2025 1.Rajendra Kumar Maheshwari S/o Late Shri Faujmal Ji Maheshwari, Aged About 55 Years; 2.Udit Maheshwari S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Maheshwari, Aged About 28 Years; 3.Ku. Simran Maheshwari D/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Maheshwari, Aged About 24 Years; All are R/o Vivekanand Nagar Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Claimants). ... Applicants versus 1.Fulsingh Rajput S/o Binda Prasad Rajput, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ward No. 22, Sheetlapara Nawapara, P.S. Nawapara District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Driver). 2.Shrawan Rajput S/o Shri Babulal Rajput, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Tarri Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Owner). 3.The Oriental Insurance Company Limited M.B. Trade Centre, IInd Floor, Near Ghadi Chowk Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Insurer). ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Date: 2025.10.31 11:02:10 +0530 2 MCC No. 1091 of 2025 4.Bharti D/o Sannilal Choudhary, Aged About 29 Years R/o Near Model School Menonite K.G. Building, Daak Bangla Ward, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 4) ... Respondents For Applicants :- Mr. P. R. Patankar, Advocate. For Respondent No.3 :- Mr. Azad Siddiqui, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 :- Mr. Kunal Das, Advocate. SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 30.10.2025 1.Hear on application for modification/correction in judgment dated 07.08.2025 passed in MAC No.1056/2022. 2.Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the word “along with interest” has not been typed after “Rs.10,00,000/-” in operative portion (paragraph No.12) of the judgment dated 07.08.2025 passed in MAC No.1056/2022. 3.In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the records, operative portion (paragraph No.12) of the above order be read as under:- 3 MCC No. 1091 of 2025 “12. So far as the apportionment of the liability is concerned, the amount of compensation in place of Rs.5,00,000/-, the parents of the deceased would be entitled to Rs.10,00,000/- ‘along with interest’ and the claimant Bharti, second wife of the deceased, is entitled for the remaining amount with interest. Rest of the conditions of the award shall remain as it is.” 4.Rest part of the judgment dated 07.08.2025 passed in MAC No.1056/2022 shall remain intact. Accordingly, the MCC stands finally disposed off. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit