Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4681 (KER)

ABDUL RAFEEK v. KOTTOPADAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH

WP(C)/10638/2025 · 2025-03-27

Ziyad Rahman A A

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:26596 WP(C) NO. 10638 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 10638 OF 2025 PETITIONER: ABDUL RAFEEK AGED 54 YEARS S/O. KUNJALAVI (LATE), KARUNAKARATH HOUSE, KODAKKAD P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678583 BY ADVS. U.K.DEVIDAS S.K.SREELAKSHMY RESPONDENTS: 1 KOTTOPADAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH KOTTOPADAM, MANNARKKAD, KOTTOPADAM P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 678583 2 TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE KOTTAPPADAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTOPADAM P.O., MANNARKKAD (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN (PRESIDENT OF GRAMA PANCHAYATH), PIN - 678583 2025:KER:26596 WP(C) NO. 10638 OF 2025 2 3 REGIONAL TRANSPOR OFFICER R.T.O. OFFICE, CHANGALEERI ROAD, KODATHIPPADI, MARRARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678762 4 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATTUKALLU POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678583 5 AUTORIKSHAW DRIVERS UNION (C.I.T.U) KODAKKAD UNIT, KODAKKAD P.O., MANNARKKAD (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 678583 6 MOTOR WORKERS ENGINEERING UNION (S.T.U.) KODAKKAD UNIT, KODAKKAD P.O., MANNARKKAD (VIA) PALAKKAD DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN – 678583 BY ADV ADV P.E.SAJAL, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:26596 WP(C) NO. 10638 OF 2025 3 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the illegal parking of the autorickshaws in front of the building of the petitioner. The petitioner had already submitted Ext.P2 representation before the 1st respondent. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to take decision thereon within a timeframe. After hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that, the 1st respondent shall place Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent Traffic Regulatory Committee without any delay and thereupon a decision on the same shall be taken by the Traffic Regulatory Committee after hearing the petitioner and the respondents 5 and 6. A 2025:KER:26596 WP(C) NO. 10638 OF 2025 4 decision in this regard shall be taken within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE scs 2025:KER:26596 WP(C) NO. 10638 OF 2025 5 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10638/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF HIS BUILDING AND UNAUTHORIZED PARKING OF AUTORIKSHAWS Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 06.03.2025 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT WITH ITS RECEIPT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 06.03.2025 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT.