SHRI BASAVANAGOUDA S/O LATE MALLANAGOUDA v. SMT. AMBAMMA ALIAS HAMPAMMA W/O SHANKRAPPA ALIAS SHANKARGOUDA
RFA/100204/2023 · 2025-02-19
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46801 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46801 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO.100204 OF 2023 BETWEEN
SHRI BASAVANAGOUDA S/O LATE MALLANAGOUDA AGE. 70 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BOMMANAHAL VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. BALLARI. ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. GURULINGESWAR G GADAG AND SRI. H.S. NAYAK, ADVOCATES)
AND SMT. AMBAMMA ALIAS HAMPAMMA W/O SHANKRAPPA ALIAS SHANKARGOUDA AGE. 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. MALYAM VILLAGE, KANEKAL MANDALAM, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SHATRINAGAR, BELLARI, TQ. AND DIST. BELLARI AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS
2 RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.11.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.183/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BALLARI, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING;
O R D E R
Four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court.
Sd/- JUDGE
Note As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 04.04.2025, the Advocate for the Appellant has not complied office objection. Hence, this RFA No.100204/2023 The appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the Court Order dated: 19.02.2025.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: cmu
C- By: sgs