1 2025:CGHC:34828-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 108 of 2025 1 - Alexander Kerketta S/o Shri Ratiram Kerketta Aged About 40 Years R/o Mayapur, Ambikapur, P.S. Kotwali, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rajkumar Toppo S/o Shri Maneshwar Toppo Aged About 35 Years R/o Akharapara, Kanchantoli, Kusmi, P.S. Kusmi, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sanjay Tigga S/o Shri Lodho Tigga Aged About 38 Years R/o Sant Ghahira Guru Ward, Pachpehdhi, Parsapali, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Manipur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chintamani S/o Late Lalaram Uraon Aged About 78 Years R/o Bhathupara Manipur Ambikapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. (Complainant) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Government Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. A.N.Pandey, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 22/07/2025 1 Heard Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1 as well as Mr. A.N.Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2 2 By this petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the FIR registered under Crime No. 369/2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 3420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code dated 05.12.2024 and its entire proceedings drawn against the petitioners on the written complaint made by the respondent No. 2 before the Station House Officer, Police Station, Manipur, District Surguja. 3 At the outset, Mr. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that since the investigation has concluded and the police has also filed the charge sheet before the competent Court, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet before the appropriate forum. 4 Learned counsel appearing for the other side have no objection. 5 In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioners to take recourse to law, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.07.23 12:22:36 +0530