IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.886 of 2025 ------ 1. Sanichar Saw, aged about 61 years, Son of Late Lilo Saw, 2. Bhawani Saw, aged 22 years, Son of Sanichar Saw, Both residents of Village-Mangoda, P.O. and P.S.-Birni, Dist.- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ramanand Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 12/02/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Birni P.S. Case No.125 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.1999 of 2024 instituted under 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 354, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the brother of the informant and when the wife of the informant tried to save him, the accused persons also attempted to murder her and outraged her modesty. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that from the side of the petitioners, the petitioner no.1 lodged Birni P.S. Case No.126 of 2024. It is next submitted that there was a free fight between the parties. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant- victim or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Birni P.S. Case No.125 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.1999 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/