Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46797 (AP)

Rokati Venkata Subbaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15729/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010270812021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15729/2021 Between: 1. ROKATI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O. LATE VENKATA NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SANGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BADVEL RURAL POLICE STATION, BADVEL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BADVEL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 4. DUGGANABOINA LAKSHUMMA, W/O. RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SANGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mand mus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 in interfering with the petitioner's rights over the land in an extent of Ac.0.01 1/2 in Sy.No.950 and Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.1125 of Gopavaram Village Fields, Gopavaram Mandal, Y.S.R. District the instance 2 of the respondent No.4, even though, the issue is seized off by a competent Civil Court in 0.S.No.311 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Badvel instituted by the respondent No.4 as colorable arbitrary, illegal exercise of power and contrary to the well established apart legal principles from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 14, 19 and 300-A of the India and Constitution of and consequently direct the respondents No.2 and 3 not to interfere with petitioner's rights over the house plots in an extent of Ac.0.01 1 /2 cents in Sy.0.950 and Ac.0.02cents in Sy.No.1125 of Gopavaram Village Fields, Gopavitram Mandal, Y.S.R. District.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the respondent No.4, the police have registered a case against the petitioner in Crime No.216 of 2020 of Badvel Rural Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 427, 509 and 506 IPC. 3. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15729 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr