1 2025:CGHC:1366-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 79 of 2025 1 - M/s Basant Kumar Gupta Through Proprietor Basant Kumar Gupta, S/o Anirudh Prasad Gupta, Aged About 50 Years, R/o House No.51, Riddhi Siddhi Resident, Avanti Nvihar, Telibandha Raipur, Distrct Raipur ( C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development Mahabnadi Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - T. Chakravorty Executive Engineer, Department of Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Executive Engineer, Department of Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development Mahabnadi Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Commissioner Department Of Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development Mahabnadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 09-01-2025 1. The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly pleased to set aside/quash the entire tender proceedings 26/11/2024 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly pleased to direct the respondent higher authorities to conduct an inquiry against the respondent no.2 and take stringent action against him. 10.3 That any other relief which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.`” 2. Learned State counsel has pointed out that the petitioner has made some representations before the competent authority, copy of the same have been annexed at page No.58 to 61 of the petition and the State Government has called for some report from the Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department vide memo dated 24-12-2024. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the State, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. Hence, the present petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy he has availed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil