Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46794 (AP)

Korra Dombu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/29550/2021 · 2025-10-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010490352021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29550/2021 Between: 1. KORRA DOMBU, S/O.BARIKI, AGED 50 YEARS, RANGASEELA VILLAGE, HUKUKMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT., ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. KORRA APPA RAO, S/O.BARIKI, AGED 35 YEARS, RANGASEELA VILLAGE, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT., ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SOCIAL WELFARE AND TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT., ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AND THE SUBCOLLECTOR, PADERU-531024, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PADERU-531024, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT., A.P. 4. THE MANDAL TAHASILDAR, HUKUMPETA, HUKUMPET MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HUKUMPET, HUKUMPET MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT., ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. LAKE DOMU, S/O.GASI @ GASANNA, AGED 42 YEARS, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 7. LAKE GURU, S/O GASI ALIAS GASANNA, 53Y, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 8. LAKE BONJU BABU, S/O.GASI ALIAS GASANNA, AGED 45 YEARS, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 9. LAKE PEDA KASULA, W/O.GURU, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 10. LAKE RUKMINI, W/O.DOMU, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 11. LAKE SANNAMMA, W/O.BONJU BABU, AGED 40 YEARS, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 12. LAKE PATTI, S/O.GURU, AGED 35 YEARS, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 13. LAKE NOINA, W/O. PATTI, AGED NOT KNOWN, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 14. LAKE BHEEMA RAJU, S/O. DOMBU, AGED 30 YEARS, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 15. V, W/O.BHEEMA RAJU, AGED NOT KNOWN, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 16. LAKE SANYASI S, S/O.GURU, AGED 35 YEARS, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 17. LAKE KESHAV RAO, S/O.DOMU, AGED NOT KNOWN, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 18. V, S/O. BONJU BABU, AGED NOT KNOWN, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 19. LAKE SURYAKANTHAN, W/O. APPALA RAJU, AGED NOT KNOWN, . BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 20. LAKE MADHU, S/O. JETIA, AGED NOT KNOWN, BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 21. LAKE RAM MURTHY, S/O.MANDU, AGED NOT KNOWN BODIGAPUT VILLAGE, RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 22. LAKE LAKSHMI, W/O. RAM MURTHY. (ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF RANGASEELA PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPET MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V S R MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not obeying the orders of the respondent No.4 passed in Reference No.427/CS dt.10.12.2019 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, direct the 5th respondent to take action as per the orders of the 4th respondent against respondents No.6 to 22 Sec.133 of CRPC as per law under, in the interest of justice.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the request made by Respondent No.4, who is the Tahsildar of Hukumpeta Mandal, a case in Crime No.67 of 2019 has been registered against the wrong doers and the Police after completion of investigation filed charge sheet which was numbered as C.C.No.280 of 2020 on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Paderu. The said case was ended in acquittal. 3. Sri V.S.R.Murthy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.10.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29550 of 2021 Dt.16.10.2025 Dinesh