Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46793 (PNJ)

VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRWP/3769/2025 · 2025-04-21

Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 CRWP No.3769 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.04.2025 Vipin Kumar .....Petitioner Versus State of UT Chandigarh & Ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR. Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sama, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Bali, Additional Public Prosecutor for UT, Chandigarh for respondents. SUKHVINDER KAUR, J (ORAL) 1 Learned State counsel has stated that detenue ‘Shanu’ had already been produced before the learned Area Magistrate and her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. has already been recorded and an FIR in this case has already been registered. 2 Keeping in view the aforesaid circumstances, the present petition has become infructuous. 3 Disposed of as having become infructuous. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) 21.04.2024 JUDGE jyoti3 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Jyoti 2025.04.21 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document