Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46792 (AP)

K. V. Rajendra, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6103/2020 · 2025-09-22

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010087722020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6103/2020 Between: 1. K. V. RAJENDRA,, S/O. CHINNA ANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, THURPU PALEM VILLAGE, NEKUNAMPET PANCHAYAT, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, SPR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPR NELLORE, SPR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, SPR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. N ASHWANI KUMAR The Court made the following Order: 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.6103 of 2020 No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in contemplating to allot the land in Sy.No.209 to an extent of Ac.4.12 cents out of which Ac.0.90 cents situated in Nekunampet Village, Kondapuramu Mandal, SPR Nellore District, which is classified as Village site poramboke, for the purpose of house sites under the Navaratnalu programme. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 22.09.2025 submits that there is no such proposal to utilize the subject land for the above said welfare scheme of housing. 4. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 22.09.2025 shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 23.09.2025 PGT