Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46790 (KAR)

FAKKIRAPPA S/O. YANKAPPA SHELLIKERI, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/103659/2024 · 2025-03-17

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4812 CRL.P No. 103659 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.103659 OF 2024 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. FAKKIRAPPA S/O. YANKAPPA SHELLIKERI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206. 2. SHIVANAND S/O. YANKAPPA SHELLIKERI, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206. 3. YALLAPPA S/O. FAKKIRAPPA SHELLIKERI, AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206. 4. SHRIKANTA S/O. FAKKIRAPPA SHELLIKERI, AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKAMAPUR, TQ. NARGUND, DIST. GADAG-582206. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.18 11:15:23 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4812 CRL.P No. 103659 of 2024 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH NARAGUND P.S., R/BY. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580011. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT.GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S. 439 OF CR.P.C. (SECTION 483 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO GRANT REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1, 2, 4 AND 5 FOR NARAGUND P.S. CRIME NO.73/2024 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 307, 302, 341, 504, 506 R/W. SECTION 149 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE S.C.NO.67/2024 PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4812 CRL.P No. 103659 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent- State has filed statement of objections. The same is taken on record. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. Memo reads as under: The Advocate for the Petitioners submits as under: That, the Petitioner want to apply for the regular bail after completion of the evidence of the material witnesses. Hence, the Petitioners want to withdraw the above petition with liberty to file fresh petition after completion of the evidence of the material witnesses. Hence, this Hon’ble court may be pleased to dismiss the Petition with liberty to file fresh petition after completion evidence of material witnesses in the ends of justice. Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC/CT:PA