Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46789 (PNJ)

M/S RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD v. RAM RATTANAND ANR

CWP/2537/2006 · 2025-07-14

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-15542-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-2537-2006 & connected cases 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (221) CM-15542-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-2537-2006 Date of Decision : July 14, 2025 M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus Ram Rattan and another .. Respondents (2) CM-15394-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-2548-2006 M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus Hukam Singh and another .. Respondents (3) CM-15361-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-2545-2006 M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus Narinder Kumar and another .. Respondents (4) CM-15395-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-2539-2006 M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus Satye Singh and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HARSHA RANI 2025.07.15 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-15542-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-2537-2006 & connected cases 2 Present: Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate, for applicant-respondent No.1 in all cases. Mr. Arun Abrol, Advocate, for the non-applicant/petitioner. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) CM-15542-CWP-2024 in CWP-2537-2006 CM-15394-CWP-2024 in CWP-2548-2006 CM-15361-CWP-2024 in CWP-2545-2006 CM-15395-CWP-2024 in CWP-2539-2006 Present applications have been filed for early hearing of the main writ petitions. Mr. Arun Abrol, Advocate, appears on behalf of the non- applicant-petitioner(s). He raises no objection for the grant of prayer as raised in the present applications. Keeping in view the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the applications are allowed and on the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the main writ petitions are taken up for hearing today itself. CWP-2537-2006 & connected cases 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute according to which, as full and final settlement of all the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent- employee(s), an amount of Rs.4,25,000/- in favour of each respondent- workman in all the writ petitions will be released within a period of 30 days. 2. Keeping in view the indulgence of the learned counsel for the parties, parties have reached amicable settlement. HARSHA RANI 2025.07.15 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-15542-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-2537-2006 & connected cases 3 3. Keeping in view the settlement between the parties, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the said amicable settlement. Any document with regard to the deposit of the Provident Fund etc. by the respondent-workman, if received at the hands of the petitioner, the said information also be supplied to the respondent-workman within a period one month period mentioned hereinbefore so that they can get the said Provident Fund released in their favour. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected cases. July 14, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.07.15 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document