Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46787 (RAJ)

SAHIL @ SOHIL SON OF JAHUR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15474/2025 · 2025-12-01

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48767] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15474/2025 Sahil @ Sohil Son Of Jahur, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Bheelamaka, Police Station Deeg, District Deeg. ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.94/2025 registered at Police Station Deeg, District Deeg for offence under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66-D and 66-E of I.T. Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this on 25.08.2025 and co-accused Insaf has been released by this Court on 19.11.2025. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 25.10.2025 and the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose [2025:RJ-JP:48767] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15474/2025] would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sahil @ Sohil, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/9