Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46780 (DEL)

SUNIL MITTAL v. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED

W.P.(C)/10079/2022 · 2025-02-07

Jyoti Singh

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10079/2022 & CM APPL. 15892/2025 SUNIL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Mittal and Mr. Sachin Aggarwal, Advs. versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sharique Hussain, Adv. (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 19.03.2025 CM APPL. 15892/2025 1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), for seeking necessary directions. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present petition had been filed assailing the order of 17th June, 2022, passed by the respondent/BSES, whereby, the petitioner’s request for restoration of electricity connection at the ground floor of the property no. 684, Bhola Nagar, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi-110003, was rejected. 3. Subsequently, vide order dated 06th July, 2022 without prejudice to his rights and contentions, the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,10,000/- with the Registrar General of this Court, subject to outcome of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:33:32 the present writ petition. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner duly deposited the said amount before the Registrar General of this Court vide DD No. 501002 dated 08th July, 2022. 4. The present petition was disposed of vide order dated 07th February, 2025, wherein, it was directed that the amount deposited by the petitioner herein, shall be released in favour of the respondent. 5. By way of the present application, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has placed on record the fact that the subsequent purchaser of the subject property, has already deposited the said amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- with the respondent. Thus, he submits that the amount of Rs. 1,10,000/-, which has been deposited by the petitioner with this Court, be released to the petitioner. 6. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr. Sharique Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 7. He confirms the fact of receipt of amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- from the subsequent purchaser of the property in question. He further submits that he has no objection if the amount deposited by the petitioner, is released to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, it is directed that the amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- deposited by the petitioner before this Court in terms of order dated 06th July, 2022, be released in favour of the petitioner, along with interest that has accrued up to date. 9. The petitioner and/or his representative are directed to approach the Registry of this Court, which shall take appropriate steps, upon such application by the petitioner. 10. Accordingly, the order dated 07th February, 2025, is modified to the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:33:32 aforesaid extent. 11. With the aforesaid directions, the present application is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J MARCH 19, 2025/kr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:33:32