102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20559-2025 Date of Decision: April 17, 2025 Surjit Singh @ Keeru …Pe11oner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Vidit Bansal, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) By way of present peon filed under Secon 482 BNSS, peoner prays for grant of ancipatory bail in a case FIR No.69 dated 01.12.2024, under Secon 15 and 29 (Act No.61 of 1985) of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Staon Fatehgarh Panjtoor, District Moga. 2. As per prosecuon allegaons, based upon a secret informaon against co-accused Veer Singh and Nishan Singh, 52 Kg. of poppy husk was recovered at their instance. In the disclosure statement, they nominated the peoner besides one Sukhwinder Singh, telling that they used to purchase the contraband from the peoner. 3. Learned counsel for the peoner contends that peoner has been falsely implicated; that no recovery was effected from him; and that he is ready to join the invesgaon. 4. Noce of moon. 5. Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts noce on behalf of the respondent-State. 6. Learned State counsel submits that the peoner is also involved in one more case and was specifically named by the co-accused to be the seller of the contraband. 7. Having regard to all the facts and circumstances, this Court consider that the custodial interrogaon of the peoner will be required to know the source of the contraband. This Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of benefit of ancipatory bail. As such, present peon is dismissed. April 17, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.04.17 12:29 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order