SHYOJIRAM @ PARIYA S/O HEERARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13656/2025 · 2025-11-07
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46761 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46761 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44665] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13656/2025
1. Shyojiram @ Pariya S/o Heeraram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Bagriyo Ki Dhani, Sunadiya, Police Station Dudu, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar).
2. Ramlal Bagriya S/o Ramnath, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Keriya Khurd Gagardu, Police Station Dudu, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Accused-Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 07/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 301/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sikar, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 305(A) & 331(4) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has voluntarily submitted that they want to adopt the reformative approach. It is submitted that 12-6 antecedents of similar type i.e. theft and robbery are registered against the applicants. It is submitted that in the interest of oneself and families, the applicants want to
[2025:RJ-JP:44665] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13656/2025] adopt the reformative approach i.e. they live outside of municipal limits of their native district for a period of six months and also mark attendance to show their bonafides in the respective jurisdictional police station of investigation on every 5th of Month qua their details and explanations.
3.
Learned counsel for State has vehemently opposed the instant bail application.
4. Heard and considered.
5. Considering the voluntarily reformative approach of the applicants, ignoring the criminal antecedents and keeping in mind the sacrosanct objective of Indian criminal reformative system, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicants on bail with following conditions: 5.1 That on every 5th of successive month, applicants will mark attendance before the jurisdictional police station, as and till
directed. 5.2 That applicants will go for their employment/work and live away from their place of residence/municipal limits for a period of six months, as voluntarily submitted by the applicants.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants Shyojiram @ Pariya S/o Heeraram & Ramlal Bagriya S/o Ramnath shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
[2025:RJ-JP:44665] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13656/2025]
7. The respondent-State will be at liberty to move a bail cancellation application, if the conditions are not complied with by the applicants.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/133