Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46757 (ALL)

VIRENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

WPIL/870/2025 · 2025-04-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61614-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 870 of 2025 Petitioner :- Virendra Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Gautam,Srishti Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Though the petition is ostensibly filed in public interest, the petitioners have not made due disclosure as required by sub-rule (3-A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which was amended in view of the judgement of the Supreme Court passed in State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others reported in 2010 AIR SCW 1029. 3. Hence, we decline to entertain the petition, since, we are not satisfied in regard to the bona fides and credentials of the petitioners. 4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition after making required disclosures, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 CS/- (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad