Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 46755 (RAJ)
DR. YOGESH GUPTA S/O LATE SH. SHIVCHARAN LAL GUPTA v. SMT. PARUL BANSAL JADON W/O SH. ASHWINI KUMAR JADON
CW/15071/2025 · 2025-10-30
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46755 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46755 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15066/2025 Dr. Yogesh Gupta S/o Late Sh. Shivcharan, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Flat No. 12/9, Girdhar Marg, Malviy Nagar, Jaipur, (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Smt. Parul Bansal Jadon W/o Sh. Ashwini Kumar Jadon, R/o Flat No. 12/9, Girdhar Marg, Malviy Nagar, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Upayukt Nagar Nigam, Sanganer Zone, (Sanganer), Jaipur.
3. Nagar Nigam Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Through Mahapore. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15071/2025 Dr. Yogesh Gupta S/o Late Sh. Shivcharan Lal Gupta, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Flat No. 12/9, Girdhar Marg, Malviy Nagar, Jaipur. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Smt. Parul Bansal Jadon W/o Sh. Ashwini Kumar Jadon, R/o Flat No. 12/9, Girdhar Marg, Malviy Nagar, Jaipur. (Raj.)
2. Upayukt Nagar Nigam Sanganer Zone, (Sanganer), Jaipur.
3. Nagar Nigam, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Through Mahapore. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15072/2025 Dr. Yogesh Gupta S/o Late Sh. Shivcharan Lal Gupta, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Flat No. 12/9, Girdhar Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Smt. Parul Bansal Jadon W/o Sh. Ashwini Kumar Jadon,
[2025:RJ-JP:43524] (2 of 2) [CW-15066/2025] R/o Flat No. 12/9, Girdhar Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. (Raj.)
2. Upayukt Nagar Nigam Sanganer Zone, (Sanganer), Jaipur.
3. Nagar Nigam Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Through Mahapore. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 30/10/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, seeks permission to withdraw these present writ petitions. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. The stay applications and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be placed in connected files.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/20/22/23