Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46754 (RAJ)

SURENDRA MEENA @ SONU S/O SHRI MUKESH MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14566/2025 · 2025-11-21

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47190] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14565/2025 Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Gopal Lal Yadav, Aged About 19 Years, Aged About 18 Year 9 Months, R/o Bichali Dhani, Tan, Nawalpura, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur (Presently Confined In Central Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14566/2025 Surendra Meena @ Sonu S/o Shri Mukesh Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kagot Ki Dhani Tan Shyampura, Police Station Viratnagar, District Kotputli Bahrod, Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Shahpura District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14912/2025 1. Sachin Gurjar @ Baba @ Jitesh @ Kana S/o Shri Narsingh Lal Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Rada Ki Dhani, Tan Mamtori, Police Station Manoharpura, District Jaipur Rural (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur, District Jaipur). 2. Rajnish Gurjar @ Rajju Gurjar S/o Shri Umrao Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mamtori Kalan, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur District Jaipur). 3. Danveer Gurjar @ Dana Gurjar S/o Shri Ramu Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Updha Jodhula, Police Station Viratnagar, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur District Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor [2025:RJ-JP:47190] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-14565/2025] ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anish Bhadala through VC Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma Mr. Vijay Singh Mr. Jagdish Prasad Gujar Ms. Chhaya Rani Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Susheel Pujari HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/11/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.250/2025 registered at Police Station-Manoharpur, District-Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 189(2), 333, 307, 109(1) and 324(4) of BNS. 2. Since all these bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. They further submit that the petitioners and the complainant are members of the same family and that no harmful injury has been caused by the petitioners to any person. It is further submitted that the parties have amicably settled their dispute. Petitioner-Manoj Kumar Yadav is behind the bars since his date of arrest, [2025:RJ-JP:47190] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-14565/2025] petitioners-Surendra Meena @ Sonu is behind the bars since 14.10.2025 and petitioners-Sachin Gurjar @ Baba @ Jitesh @ Kana, Rajnish Gurjar @ Rajju Gurjar and Danveer Gurjar @ Dana Gurjar are behind the bars since 27.10.2025. No custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail applications but accedes the arguments advanced by learned counsels for the petitioners by submitting that the compromise has been effected between all the parties. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 7. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Gopal Lal Yadav, Surendra Meena @ Sonu S/o Shri Mukesh Meena, Sachin Gurjar @ Baba @ Jitesh @ Kana S/o Shri Narsingh Lal Gurjar, Rajnish Gurjar @ Rajju Gurjar S/o Shri Umrao Gurjar and Danveer Gurjar @ Dana Gurjar S/o Shri Ramu Gurjar shall be released on bail on their [2025:RJ-JP:47190] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-14565/2025] furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/146-148