Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46748 (KAR)

SAIDAPPA AND ORS v. THE SPECIAL LAND AND ORS

MFA/203058/2023 · 2025-02-03

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 203058 OF 2023 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1. SAIDAPPA S/O KASHIRAM AGE:53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O IJERI, TQ: JEWARGI, DIST:KALABURAGI - 585310. 2. LAXMAN S/O KASHIRAM AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O IJERI, TQ: JEWARGI, DIST: KALABURAGI - 585310. 3. LAXMIBAI W/O MACHENDRA WATKAR AGE:61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O IJERI, TQ: JEWARGI, DIST: KALABURAGI - 585310. 4. SANJEEVKUMAR S/O RUKMANNA DOR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O IJERI, TQ: JEWARGI, DIST: KALABURAGI - 585310. ...APPELLANTS 2 MFA NO.203058/2023 (BY SRI. S.N PADSHETTY, SRI. S.V. PATIL AND SRI. S.M. PATIL ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICE, UKP, KBJNL, BHIMARAYANGUDI, TQ: SHAHAPUR, DIST: YADGIRI - 585227. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, STATION ROAD, KALABURAGI - 585102. 3. KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KR, CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560002. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 74(1) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION, RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT IT IS PRAYED THAT THE HON’BLE COURT MAY KINDLY BE ALLOW THE APPEAL WITH COSTS AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KALABURAGI IN LAC NO.154/2022 AND FIX THE MARKET VALUE FOR LAND ACQUIRED AT THE RATE OF Rs.6,45,120/- PER ACRE AND AWARD ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS. FURTHER GRANTED OTHER RELIEF, WHICH THIS HON’BLE 3 MFA NO.203058/2023 COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER One week time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, appeal stands dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide order dated 03.02.2025 advocate for the appellant has not complied the office objections. Hence, appeal stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. SSdd//-- A ASSSSIISSTTA AN NTT R REEG GIISSTTR RA AR R T By : SB R By : VK C By : NHD