[2025:RJ-JP:50516] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19625/2025 Amit Singh S/o Late Shri Harendra Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Pathaina, Tehsil Bhusavar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Joint Secretary Department Of Personnal (B-1), Secretariat Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Director, Pension Department, Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal Ms. Priyanka Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore and Ms. Saba Naz for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. Satyam Bharadwaj for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with following prayer: (i) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to give compassionate appointment to the petitioner for the post of LDC, as per his eligibility and with all consequential benefits submitting his application. from the date of submitting his application. [2025:RJ-JP:50516] (2 of 3) [CW-19625/2025] (ii) The Hon'ble Court may kindly pass such other order or a direction, which it may deem just, proper and in expedient the circumstances of the present case. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 07.03.2025 in writ petition No.10350/2016 titled as Bharat Kumar Vs. Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. And Ors. Submits that the petitioner has filed representation for compassionate appointment under the Rules to the respondents but same has not been considered. 3. Issue notice to respondents. 4. Mr. Satyam Bharadwaj for Ms. B.S. Chabba accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3 whereas Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. 5. Learned counsel for respondents submits that petitioner may be directed to file reply in light of the judgment which may be considered by the respondents. 6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner in light of ratio laid down in case of Bharat Kumar Vs. Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. And Ors. (supra) but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the [2025:RJ-JP:50516] (3 of 3) [CW-19625/2025] decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /37