1 HN, J C.C.No.1458_2025 APHC010298012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1458/2025 Between: 1. N. NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O MUNI REDDY, AGE77, YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 19-7-79, H-3, GOPALARAJU COLONY, TIRUPATI. TIRUPATI DISTRICT. BEING REP.BY HIS G.P.A HOLDER P. LINGAMURTHY,S/O ANKIREDDY, 68 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 9- 505,LINGESWARA NAGAR, SAL NAGAR GRAMAPANCHAYAT,TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CH GOVINDHU, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGEMAJOR, CIRCLE INSPECTOR, TIRUPATI RURAL POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI. 2. MUTHAYALA RAMAKRISHNA, STATION HOUSE OFFICER (S.H.O), TIRUPATI RURAL POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the contemnors and punish them under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their willful of and deliberate violation of the interim Orders of this Hon ble Court passed in WP.No. 10308 of 2025, dt.22.04.2025 passed by his Lordships Honble Sri Justice HARINATH.N, and to pass 2 HN, J C.C.No.1458_2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to order to implead proposed Respondents as Respondent No.3 to 6 in C.C.No.1458 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVALARAJU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A JAYANTHI 3 HN, J C.C.No.1458_2025 ORDER: 1. The present contempt case is filed to summon the contemnors and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their willful and deliberate violation of the interim orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.10308 of 2025, dated 22.04.2025. 2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits in their counter affidavit that the respondent authorities received a call through the dial 100 service alleging that certain individuals were selling and consuming illegal liquor inside the disputed land. On receipt of such information, personnel from the concerned police station were sent to verify the situation. However, upon arrival, the gate was found locked, and the police personnel belonging to the 2nd respondent police station returned without any further action. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents, along with the Executive Officer and others, have trespassed into the property. It is further submitted that a survey was conducted, demarcating the petitioner’s property as land in Survey No.147/1, whereas the petitioner’s actual property consists of Survey Nos.145 and 148/2. 4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with the survey report furnished. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 HN, J C.C.No.1458_2025 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.09.2025 NKA 5 HN, J C.C.No.1458_2025 607 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Contempt Case NO: 1458 of 2025 Date: 12.09.2025 NKA