1 2025:CGHC:3071 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 294 of 2025 1 - Dr. Harishkant Pandey S/o Late Ramakant Pandey Aged About 62 Years R/o 507, Mininiyam Chowk, Sunder Nagar, Raipur District Raipur, C.G. .. Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - Appellate Committee Municipal Corporation, Raipur, C.G. 4 - Romel Pandey S/o Girishkant Pandey Aged About 28 Years R/o In front Of Shetla Mandir, Kankalipara, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. ... Respondent(s) Cause title is taken from the Case Information System For Petitioner : Shri Rahil Arun Kochar, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer For Respondent/Corporation : Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. with Shri Rakshit Tiwari, Advocate Order on Board By Bibhu Datta Guru, J. 17/1/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the order of mutation was passed by the respondent No.2 in favour of the 2 respondent No.4 on 2-1-2019, which has been challenged by the petitioner by filing an appeal before the respondent No.3/Appellate Committee, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, but till date the same has not been considered and decided and the same is pending consideration since last more than one year. Learned counsel would seek a direction towards the respondent No.3 to decide the said pending appeal within a stipulated period. 2. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the Corporation, on instructions, would submit that if the appeal of the petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent No.3, the same shall be considered and decided. 3. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents. 4. Considering the submissions made by both the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3/Appellate Committee to consider and decide the pending appeal of the petitioner, in accordance with law and on its own merits, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 30 days, if the same has not been decided till date. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Gowri K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Digitally signed by K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Date: 2025.01.17 17:19:47 +0530