APHC010295462004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 24736/2004 Between: 1. S. NAGARAJU, KRISHNA DISTRICT., S/O. SUBRAMANYAM, C/O. B. KRISHNA RAO, D.NO. 74-1-5, ROAD NO. 10 ELECTRICITY COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY W G DISTRICT 2 OTHERS, ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1988 & DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE AUTHORITY UNDER A P SHOP ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1988 & ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1988 & THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR VIJAYAWADA 3. M/S VASUNDHARA A/C, REPRESENTED BY SRI K.V. SURESH BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN R/O. BESANT ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order direction or wit particularly one in the nature of writ certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records from the Appellate Authority under A.P. Shops & Establishment Act, 1988 & Deputy Commissioner of Labour in A.P.S.A. No. 9 of 2003 quash the order dated 22- 11-2003; and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with back wages and all attendant benefits and pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 32366 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition and pass such further or other orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. K S MURTHY The Court made the following: ORDER: On 12.07.2024, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter has been listed finally. Despite such direction, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22nd September, 2025 RKS