CRM-M-20523-2025 S. No.104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-20523 of 2025 Date of Decision:16.04.2025 Sanjay .....Pe++oner Vs. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Partap Singh, Advocate with Mr. Santosh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral) By way of this peon filed under Secon 482 of the Bharaya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, peoner prays for grant of ancipatory bail in case FIR No.80 dated 25.02.2025 registered under Secons 115, 324(4), 333, 351(3) of BNS, 2023 at Police Staon Chandimandir, District Panchkula, Haryana. 2.1 FIR was lodged on the complaint of Sandeep Kumar, resident of House No.25, Sector-25, Panchkula. It was alleged that on 24.02.2025, when complainant was present at his home in the late evening hours, suddenly Sanjay Kumar (peoner), who earlier used to live in the neighbourhood, came under the influence of intoxicants and holding a bo8le of alcohol in his hands. When complainant asked him to leave the house, peoner told that he wanted to meet his brother. A:er some me, Balwan Arya, friend of complainant also reached there. Despite their persistent asking the peoner to leave the place, Page No.1 out of 3 pages RENU 2025.04.16 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-20523-2025 he did not budge and rather gave tooth bites to the complainant as well as his friend. Peoner was also threatening neighbour Mr. Ram Swaroop Sharma (Rered IAS Officer) to cut off his hands and legs. 2.2 On the afore-said statement, inially DDR was recorded. Police went to the spot on 25.02.2025 to verify the facts, where complainant, his friend Balwan Arya and other persons were present. Ram Swaroop Verma told that on the previous date, at 10:20 PM, peoner had also a8acked at his gate and had damaged glasses of the four cars lying parked by throwing bricks and stones. It was further found that the enre incident was captured on CCTV Camera installed in the house of Ram Swaroop Verma. A:er verificaon of the facts, FIR was registered. 3. It is contended by learned counsel that the peoner has been falsely implicated; that peoner was given beangs by the complainant party for which peoner got treatment at Panipat on 25.02.2025. It is further alleged there is some dispute with Mr. Ram Swaroop Verma, Rered IAS Officer, who has not come forward and has rather falsely implicated him in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the peoner is ready to join the invesgaon and so he may be allowed ancipatory bail. 4. Noce of moon. 5. Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. AG, Haryana, accepts noce on behalf of the respondent- State. Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate appears for the complainant and filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 6. Strongly opposing the peon, learned counsel for the complainant has shown various photographs to this Court revealing at least four cars, the glasses of which were broken allegedly by the peoner. The allegaons as made in the FIR were verified to be correct as per the police invesgaon. CCTV camera also captured the incident. Page No.2 out of 3 pages RENU 2025.04.16 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-20523-2025 7. Having noced the enre facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant the benefit of ancipatory bail to the peoner. 8. Dismissed. April 16, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Page No.3 out of 3 pages RENU 2025.04.16 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh