IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36514 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2025 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Bittu Sahani son of Rajkishor Sahani village- Agarwa, P.S.- Motihari, Dist- Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 18-06-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 24.02.2025, seeks regular bail in connection with Banjariya P.S. Case No. 116 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals had killed the deceased. The informant, who is the son of the deceased, suspected the petitioner as one of the killers, as there was a dispute with regard to sale of land and Rs.21,00,000/-. The police raided the house of the petitioner where the brother of the petitioner, namely, Golu Sahani was arrested and four cartridges were recovered from Golu Sahani. Thereafter, Golu Sahani took Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36514 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/2 the police to a field where the murder weapon was kept concealed. Thereafter, in his self inculpatory statement Golu Sahani has said that the petitioner, Golu Sahani and other co- accused had conspired to kill the deceased and, thereafter, they intercepted the deceased. The petitioner and his brother were riding on the same motorcycle and after the petitioner identified the deceased, he was shot by the co-accused, Golu Sahani. 4. From the materials collected during investigation, it appears that the petitioner and other co-accused persons conspired together and killed the deceased. The murder weapon has been recovered from a field on the statement of the co- accused who has named the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected. 6. The trial is directed to be expedited. anand/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T