Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46729 (AP)

PALAVALASA APPALA SWAMY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/5560/2020 · 2025-10-07

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010092842020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5560/2020 Between: 1. PALAVALASA APPALA SWAMY, S/O LATE SURAPU NAIDU, AGED. 67 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO FLAT NO.302, SSE PARADISE, SEETHAMMADHARA , VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VI DISTRICT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent no.4 there by directing petitioner to not to enter his Agriculture landadmeasuring an extent of Ac 3-00 Cents in Survey Numbers 10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5560/2020 PALAVALASA APPALA SWAMY, S/O LATE SURAPU NAIDU, AGED. 67 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO FLAT NO.302, SSE PARADISE, SEETHAMMADHARA , VISHAKAPATNAM-16, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT THE TAHSILDHAR, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent no.4 there by directing petitioner to not to enter his Agriculture landadmeasuring an extent of 00 Cents in Survey Numbers 10919, 109/11, 109/12 ( Old Survey IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3233] THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN PALAVALASA APPALA SWAMY, S/O LATE SURAPU NAIDU, AGED. 67 YEARS, OCC. 67 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO FLAT NO.302, SSE PARADISE, 16, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISHAKAPATNAM, SAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent no.4 there by directing petitioner to not to enter his Agriculture landadmeasuring an extent of 919, 109/11, 109/12 ( Old Survey 2 BKM,J W.P.No.5560 of 2020 Numbers 281/2) situated in Kapulauppada (v), Bheemunipatnam (M), Visakhapatnam District the Suit Subject Matter of OS.no.389 of 2019 on the file of lst Additional Senior Civil Judge. Visakapatnamas illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent no.4to not to dispossess the Petitioner from his Agriculture landadmeasuring an extent of Ac 3-00 Cents in Survey Numbers 10919, 109/11, 109/12 situated in Kapulauppada (v), Bheemunipatnam (M), Visakhapatnam District the Suit Schedule Property of OS.no.389 of 2019 on the file of 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge. Visakapatnam and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Respondent no.4to not to dispossess the Petitioner from his Agriculture landadmeasuring an extent of Ac 3-00 Cents in Survey Numbers 109/9, 109/11, 109/12 situated in Kapulauppada (v), Bheemunipatnam (M), Visakhapatnam District the Suit Schedule Property of OS.no.389 of 2019 on the file of 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge: Visakapatnamand to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.5560 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: On 06.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. In spite of the orders passed by this Court dated 13.08.2025, for making an alternative arrangement either by appearing in-person or through the counsel, no such arrangement is made and no representation is made today for the petitioner. 2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 08.10.2025 MDP