Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46727 (AP)

Gonnabathula Kasi Nooka Parameswara Rao v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25447/2022 · 2025-11-18

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010413192022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25447/2022 Between: 1. GONNABATHULA KASI NOOKA PARAMESWARA RAO, S/O.SESHA RAO, AGED 36 YRS, R/O.SAITHARU PETA VILLAGE, S.RAYAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PR. SECREATARY PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMIONER PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, ELAMANCHILI CIRCLE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in running wine shop (RD code-03963 (TRC-36) ) adjacent to Anjeaneya Swamy Temple situated at Saitharupeta Village, S.Rayavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, as illegal arbitrary, violative of principals of natural justice and contrary to rule 25 of A.P. Excise (Grant of license of selling by shop and conditions of license)rules 2012 conseqently direct the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the representation dt. 11.07.2022 submitted by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the representation dt. 11.07.2022 submitted by the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25447 OF 2022 ORDER: Sri Harsha S.Ammineni, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that no further orders are required in the present writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be closed. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.11.2025 KBN 31 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25447 of 2022 Date: 19.11.2025 KBN