IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10810 OF 2025 Between: Kanuganti Srinu, S/o Narasimh^ Rao, Aged about 46 years, Residing at Anupalem Village, Rajupalemmandal, Palnadu District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District at Narasaraopet. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattenapalli Division, Sattenapalli, Palnadu district. 4. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Rural Police Station, Sattenapalli, Palnadu district. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order Direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the 4 herein to produce the detenues viz Ravipudi Tirumala Rao, Chiranjeevi, aged about 37 years, and Ravipudi Gopinadh, S/o Chiranjeevi, aged about 35 years who are illegal detenue by the 4**^ respondent 19-4-2025 before this Honble Court and hand declaring his detention is illegal and arbitrary and to grant. may one th respondent S/o on over them to me after — I f Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. V. S. MEHAR ^ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: THE ADVOCATE The Court made the following: ORDER GENERAL \ 1 APHC010216982025 QMS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] K- \ MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE honourable SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO the honourable dr justice K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10810/2025 \ Between: ...PETITIONER Kanuganti Srinu AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G VS MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 the ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) ...RESPONDENT(S) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged detenues had already been released on bail. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is closed leaving it petitioner/detenues to agitate their rights in accordance with law. 2 /s. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. / Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGI^AR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTJON OFFICER 1. One CC to Sri G. V. S. Mehar Kumar, 2. Two CC’s to the Advocate General [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies. Advocate [OPUC] High Court of A.P. at Amaravati ssb HIGH COURT DATED:05/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.10810 of 2025 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS