TANU RANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/3728/2025 · 2025-04-22
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46723 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46723 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
108
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3728-2025 DECIDED ON: 22.04.2025 TANU RANI AND ANOTHER
.....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Hasan Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner (through Hybrid Mode). Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the official respondents no. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6. Affidavit of Lokender Singh, IPS, Superintendent of Police, Panipat, Haryana, has been filed, which is taken on record. Perusal of the affidavit depicts that statement of respondents No.4 to 6 have been recorded in which they stated that they will not cause any harm to the petitioners and they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. In the light of above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 22.04.2025
JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.04.23 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document