Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46723 (BOM)

MANSARAM JAYRAM DHANDE v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER

WP/5025/2023 · 2025-10-06

Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

5.wp.5025.23 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5025 of 2023 Mansaram Jayram Dhande vs. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati & Another =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. S.N. Chikhale, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. B.M. Lonare, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 6 th OCTOBER, 2025. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the controversy forming subject matter of the present petition is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 24/08/2022 passed in the matter of Ramsingh Batu Dhande vs. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati and another in Writ Petition No.7880/2017. 02. The learned Advocate for the respondents does not dispute the statement. 03. In that view of the matter, the petition is partly allowed. The award dated 22/06/2017 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Amravati in Reference (IDA) No.1/2010 is modified by deleting the direction for payment of compensation of Rs.25,000/- in lieu of reinstatement and instead directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service. However, having regard to the delay and also in view of the judgment dated 24/08/2022 referred above, the petitioner will be entitled to back wages from 22/06/2017 only i.e. the date of the award. JUDGE *sandesh 2025:BHC-NAG:10252