[2025:RJ-JP:44895] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14499/2025 1. Rattiram S/o Shriman, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Sanet Ka Pura, Police Station Shri Mahaveerji, District Karauli. (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli) 2. Bablu S/o Murarilal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Sanet Ka Pura, Police Station Shri Mahaveerji, District Karauli. (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli) 3. Ajaysingh @ Tunda S/o Radheshyam, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sanet Ka Pura, Police Station Shri Mahaveerji, District Karauli. (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal, Adv.with Mr. Praveen Balwada, Mr. Sunil Shekhawat Mr. Aditya Raj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Swati Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No.137/2025 registered at Police Station Shri Mahaveerji, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(2) of BNS and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. [2025:RJ-JP:44895] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14499/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that this is a case of cross-FIRs. It is submitted that persons from the opposite side have been enlarged on bail on the same pretext and that the applicants have no criminal antecedents registered against themselves, except for one applicant. It is also submitted that the applicants have been in custody for a period of one and a half months. It is also submitted that the charge-sheet has not been filed as on date. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have stoutly opposed the bail application. It is submitted by counsel for the complainant that the matter pertains to a heinous offence registered under Section 109(2) of BNS. It is submitted that one person was hit hard on the chest by a gunshot and other persons have also sustained injuries. It is further submitted that specific allegations are levelled in the FIR, the investigation is ongoing and the aggressors were from the applicants’ side. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the complainant, the fact that the matter is of heinous nature; that one person was hit hard on chest by gun shot and other persons have also sustained injury; that specific allegations are levelled in the FIR, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present bail application at this stage. 6. Accordingly, bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /212