[2025:RJ-JP:49292] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18746/2025 Poornmal Son Of Pemaram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Mukam Post Chichasat, Laxmangarh District Sikar, Rajasthan. (Currently Working As A Chokidar At The Sc/st Government Hostel, Laxmangarh District Sikar) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Near 22 Godam Bridge, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.C. Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and: “A. By an appropriate, writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to grant minimum pay scale of the post of Class-IV Servant and Similar benefits should be given to the Petitioners as per judgment of Writ Petition No. 16428/2024, Rajesh Kumar vs. State. [2025:RJ-JP:49292] (2 of 3) [CW-18746/2025] B. Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner.”” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 24.03.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13667/2024 titled as Balu Ram Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court (on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Anokha Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 372/2013. He further submitted that instant writ petition may be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of ratio laid down in cases of Balu Ram Meena (supra) and Anokha Bai (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Balu Ram Meena (supra) and Anokha Bai (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:49292] (3 of 3) [CW-18746/2025] petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /84